OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmopen-members message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: CGM Profiles -- Input needed


I also agree with Dave and Bruce,

Dieter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cruikshank, David W" <David.Cruikshank@PSS.Boeing.com>
To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com>;
<cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: RE: CGM Profiles -- Input needed


> I agree, they should become technical reports...I remember them covering
three areas of a 2-d space of something like cost vs complexity.  It was a
good academic exercise, but no one jumped on them...
>
> thx...Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 8:51 AM
> To: cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Fwd: CGM Profiles -- Input needed
>
>
> CGM Open Members --
>
> I have assumed the role of liaison to ISO SC24, the ISO home committee of
> the CGM standard.  This job was formerly held by John Gebhardt.
>
> I'd like to get opinions about the attached -- what do we feel about these
> ISO profiles?  For background, they were developed following a workshop in
> the UK, which identified a small number of potentially useful standard
> profiles of CGM.  One aligned roughly with the ATA/CALS tradition, another
> aligned roughly with PIP.  In some sense, they were intended to be a
family
> of alternate model profiles, which had functional richness targeted at
> certain typical application sectors (the real Model Profile is "maximally
> rich for any reasonable profile").
>
> They are, to my knowledge, not actually called out as a requirement by any
> application community.
>
> One possibility, which is not mentioned and which I have not investigated
> yet, would be to change their status to Technical Reports.  Then they
would
> not be standards per se (as they are now -- ISP, International
Standardized
> Profile), but would continue to exist in ISO for reference purposes.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Regards,
> Lofton.
>
> >Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:53:05 -0400
> >From: jean stride <100434.3031@compuserve.com>
> >Subject: CGM Profiles
> >Sender: jean stride <100434.3031@compuserve.com>
> >To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
> >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@rockynet.com>
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >Do you remember being involved with the work led by
> >Anne Mumford in the developing of CGM Profiles
> >(ISO/IEC ISP 12071 Parts 1 - 4) developed in JTC 1-SGFS
> >
> >They are up for 5yr review and we need to make some recommendations
> >on whether to confirm, withdraw or revise - can you help ??
> >Jean
>
>
> *******************
> Lofton Henderson
> 1919 Fourteenth St., #604
> Boulder, CO   80302
>
> Phone:  303-449-8728
> Email:  lofton@rockynet.com
> *******************



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC