[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: ISP Question
Lofton and all, I agree with Dave, "Withdraw and preserve in CGMO seems like a good solution." I don't understand why the four profiles cannot be published as ISO/IEC Technical Reports. But ... ah well. Is there any value is planning to offer the WebCGM Profile and the ATA profile as ISPs? Bruce Lofton Henderson wrote: > > CGM Open Members -- > > It appears that it is not an option, to republish the 4 ISPs as a Technical > Report. > > Does anyone object to the "withdraw" option? > > (CGMO could perhaps capture and archive the ISP source documents, to ensure > that they're not completely lost -- may be of historical or some other > interest, some day.) > > -Lofton. > > >Reply-To: <puk@igraphics.com> > >From: "Richard F. Puk" <rfpuk@earthlink.net> > >To: <lofton@terminal.rockynet.com>, "Steve Carson" <carson@gscassociates.com>, > > <100434.3031@compuserve.com> > >Subject: RE: ISP Question > >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:33:53 -0700 > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) > >Importance: Normal > >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@terminal.rockynet.com> > > > >Hi, Lofton -- > > > >Converting these to technical reports does not appear to be an option. Our > >choices are Confirm, > >Withdraw, and Revise and there is no manpower or expertise to do revisions. > > > > -- Dick > > > >************************************************** > >* Richard F. Puk, Ph.D. > >* President > >* Intelligraphics Incorporated > >* 7644 Cortina Court, Carlsbad, CA 92009-8206 USA > >* Ph: 1-760-753-9027, E-Mail: puk@igraphics.com > >************************************************** > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: lofton [mailto:lofton@terminal.rockynet.com] > > > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 7:30 PM > > > To: Steve Carson; puk@igraphics.com; 100434.3031@compuserve.com > > > Subject: ISP Question > > > > > > > > > Hello Everyone -- > > > > > > Regarding the question of the 4 ISPs: the consensus is that we > > > think they should be preserved as Technical Reports. But there > > > has been negligible commercial or other implementation interest, > > > and therefore it is probably not appropriate to continue them as > > > international standards. > > > > > > Regards, > > > -Lofton. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC