OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmopen-members message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: RE: ISP Question


Ok with that.

Franck DULUC

PS: Dave I am wearing my nice hat :-)

Franck DULUC
Airbus
SDN7 - D0611
316, route de Bayonne - 31060 TOULOUSE Cedex
&(33) 5.61.18.19.16   * (33) 5.61.18.40.46
*franck.duluc@airbus.aeromatra.com


> -----Message d'origine-----
> De: Bruce L. Garner [mailto:brucegar@pacbell.net]
> Date: mardi 12 juin 2001 17:47
> À: Lofton Henderson
> Cc: cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org
> Objet: RE: ISP Question
> 
> 
> Lofton and all,
> 
> I agree with Dave, "Withdraw and preserve in CGMO seems like a good
> solution."
> 
> I don't understand why the four profiles cannot be published 
> as ISO/IEC
> Technical Reports. But ... ah well.
> 
> Is there any value is planning to offer the WebCGM Profile and the ATA
> profile as ISPs? 
> 
> Bruce
> 
> Lofton Henderson wrote:
> > 
> > CGM Open Members --
> > 
> > It appears that it is not an option, to republish the 4 
> ISPs as a Technical
> > Report.
> > 
> > Does anyone object to the "withdraw" option?
> > 
> > (CGMO could perhaps capture and archive the ISP source 
> documents, to ensure
> > that they're not completely lost -- may be of historical or 
> some other
> > interest, some day.)
> > 
> > -Lofton.
> > 
> > >Reply-To: <puk@igraphics.com>
> > >From: "Richard F. Puk" <rfpuk@earthlink.net>
> > >To: <lofton@terminal.rockynet.com>, "Steve Carson" 
> <carson@gscassociates.com>,
> > >         <100434.3031@compuserve.com>
> > >Subject: RE: ISP Question
> > >Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 19:33:53 -0700
> > >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
> > >Importance: Normal
> > >X-RCPT-TO: <lofton@terminal.rockynet.com>
> > >
> > >Hi, Lofton --
> > >
> > >Converting these to technical reports does not appear to 
> be an option. Our
> > >choices are Confirm,
> > >Withdraw, and Revise and there is no manpower or expertise 
> to do revisions.
> > >
> > >   -- Dick
> > >
> > >**************************************************
> > >* Richard F. Puk, Ph.D.
> > >* President
> > >* Intelligraphics Incorporated
> > >* 7644 Cortina Court, Carlsbad, CA  92009-8206 USA
> > >* Ph:  1-760-753-9027, E-Mail: puk@igraphics.com
> > >**************************************************
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: lofton [mailto:lofton@terminal.rockynet.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 7:30 PM
> > > > To: Steve Carson; puk@igraphics.com; 100434.3031@compuserve.com
> > > > Subject: ISP Question
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello Everyone --
> > > >
> > > > Regarding the question of the 4 ISPs:  the consensus is that we
> > > > think they should be preserved as Technical Reports.  But there
> > > > has been negligible commercial or other implementation interest,
> > > > and therefore it is probably not appropriate to continue them as
> > > > international standards.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > -Lofton.
> > > >
> 


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC