RE: [chairs] Oasis document identifiers - conclusion?

["Breininger, Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>]

I agree with Drummond.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@sun.com]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 8:39 AM
To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [chairs] Oasis document identifiers - conclusion?


As far as I know these files will never be in the same area, but 
general-to-specific is pretty much my reasoning for preferring the 
latter...  Does anyone *disagree* with the second style shown below?

	Eve

Drummond Reed wrote:
 > Is this preferable?
> 
>    draft-saml-bindings-05
>    draft-saml-bindings-06
>    cs-saml-bindings-01
> 
> Or is this?
> 
>    saml-draft-bindings-05
>    saml-draft-bindings-06
>    saml-cs-bindings-01
> 
> Drummond replies:
> 
> Classic database sorting decision. The latter makes the most sense. Imagine
> searching long lists of TC docs from many TCs. To have them grouped by TC
> seems a lot more intuitive than by status.
-- 
Eve Maler                                        +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems                            cell +1 781 354 9441
Web Technologies and Standards               eve.maler @ sun.com


----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>