[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Quorum required for good standing; was RE: [chairs] Info forchair setup of Kavi TC areas
Jon, you say: > Note that in mail votes (including email), a majority is a > majority of all of those casting a vote -- not necessarily a > majority of the entire membership. That was possibly true in previous versions of the TC process. Currently this has been clarified to avoid ambiguities, and the TC process nowadays says: "For the purposes of mail vote counting, quorum is constituted by the whole TC membership." -- The reasoning behind this is that the whole membership is always available and present for email votes. What is still not clear to me is whether in a 10 person TC, given, let's say, 3 abstentions, are 4 positive votes enough to pass, or are 5 positive votes required no matter what. I guess because I've never understood whether abstentions are counted as negative votes or simply as no-votes-that-reduce-the-quorum-count. On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 15:20, Jon Bosak wrote: > | I think the OASIS process, regularly scheduled meetings, open > | archives and minutes, ability of 10% of membership to veto a > | Standard, has adequate safeguards to keep a small group from > | hijacking a TC. > > Just remember that you can't take formal action without a quorum. > The rules provide for this by extending Robert's to allow voting > by email (if the TC votes, in a quorate meeting, to allow the > chair to operate this way). So the right way to handle a group > that has a hard time achieving a quorum is to adopt standing rules > that authorize email voting and allow the inquorate group to > automatically become a committee whose recommendations can, if > necessary, be submitted to the whole TC by email. > > Note that in mail votes (including email), a majority is a > majority of all of those casting a vote -- not necessarily a > majority of the entire membership. This is exactly the same rule > as when voting in a quorate meeting. To put it another way (I > don't believe Robert's puts it this way, but I find it a useful > way to think about it), in email a quorum is always present. > > Jon -- Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM Web Technologies and Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 x31442 Sun Microsystems Inc. | 1800 Harrison St. Oakland, CA 94612 W3C AC Rep / OASIS TAB Chair
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC