Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing

[Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>]

Jon Bosak wrote:

> In mail votes the concept of a quorum is meaningless, because in
> mail everyone is always present.  This also has nothing to do with
> counting the votes.
That is assuming the email vote is announed in sufficient advance
of the due date that no member can miss it due to a simple thing
like a vacation for three weeks.

Tom Rutt
Fujitsu
wsrm chair

> 
> Jon
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
> 


-- 
----------------------------------------------------
Tom Rutt		email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@fsw.fujitsu.com
Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133