[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
Yep. Lack of positive response from the membership results in the vote failing to pass, and the status quo prevails. -- Steve -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Kenton [mailto:jkenton@datapower.com] Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:54 PM To: Hal Lockhart Cc: Steve Anderson; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing Hal Lockhart wrote: > I like Steve's proposal. > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Steve Anderson [mailto:sanderson@opennetwork.com] >>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:30 PM >>To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing >> ... >> If we take this path, the replacement text would be: >> >> "Email votes require majority of TC membership in order to pass." >> Note that a literal reading of this phrase makes deliberate abstentions equivalent to "NO" votes. --- -------------------------- Jeff Kenton DataPower Technology, Inc.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC