[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] No more Committee Specifications?
OK, thanks for the suggestions, David. I'll bring these up with the Board. -Karl David RR Webber wrote: > Karl, > > Ok - that clarifies the document stuff - but > maybe we should have an alternate name for > those who are intending to move theirs forward, > afterall - I suspect this is the majority. > > I see how Committee Draft works as the staging > point. Then maybe after the 30 days review and > update - this should be a Committee Reviewed Draft? > Some fine tuning would help. > > On the voting front - having the ability to vote > either to approve the specification, or to approve it > and submit to OASIS membership - as single steps - > pick the one you want to do - would certainly > help with vote logistics. > > On the verification statements - a suggestion would > be - 3 member companies / and / or - open source > implementation with certification from a fielded > project and results. > > With the later - some discretion I think should apply, > so OASIS could ask for additional validations / or > details (white papers are good) and delay the > process accordingly - if it felt there was > not ample enough on the first pass to provide an > equivalent level of adoption. I feel this needs to > have the right balance - so that abuse can be > prevented - while not stifling emerging technology > and making it still-born. > > I definately appreciate your endeavours to improve > this all for us. > > Thanks, DW. > > -- ================================================================= Karl F. Best Vice President, OASIS office +1 978.667.5115 x206 mobile +1 978.761.1648 karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]