Re: [chairs] Specification Namespaces? Standard XML Schema ValidationService

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

/ "Karl F. Best" <karl.best@oasis-open.org> was heard to say:
| The URN has never been part of the TC Process. While it has been
| mentioned in other places, nothing has changed about the namespace,
| policies concerning it, or how we (don't :-) administer it since it
| was first granted to us.

There may be no formal policy for when we mint them, but the rules
that we are constrained to use are part of the RFC.

We can amend those constraints, but I think we'd have to republish the
RFC, I think.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

PGP signature