[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] Specification Namespaces? Standard XML Schema ValidationService
The TAB has considered, and recommended to the Board, a similar suggestion in regards to the quality of the specifications that are submitted to the OASIS membership for consideration as an OASIS Standard. So it's being considered. I agree with Norm that checking may be difficult... -Karl Norman Walsh wrote: > / Rex Brooks <rexb@starbourne.com> was heard to say: > | Can we establish a standard validation service for all OASIS > | specification schemata, and require validation using this validation > | service for a Committee Draft (or Committee Specification if we change > | it back to that formulation to avoid confusion) and for Submission of > | a Committee Draft to OASIS for approval of a candidate standard? > > I expect not. I can imagine TCs wanting to publish schemas in exactly > one of the following: SGML DTDs, XML DTDs, RELAX NG, W3C XML Schema, > Schematron, and perhaps a number of other things. > > Naturally, I thinkj TCs should make sure that the schemas the publish > are valid against the schema that defines their schema language of > choice. But adding a formal process to assure this seems awfully > heavyweight to me. > > Be seeing you, > norm > -- ================================================================= Karl F. Best Vice President, OASIS office +1 978.667.5115 x206 mobile +1 978.761.1648 karl.best@oasis-open.org http://www.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]