[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] RE: [members] OASIS member review of proposed revision ofTC Process
On Oct 14, 2004, at 12:14 PM, Eduardo Gutentag wrote: > To deposit spec drafts in a > cvs repository outside of OASIS and only from time to time bring in > milestones, > depriving people outside of the TC (that is, people who may not know > of the > existence of the repository) the ability to trace the evolution of a > spec, > would also threaten the openness and accountability of the process. > I think OASIS needs to balance openness with usability. My TC (ebxml-msg) uses a subversion repository on my personal server for collaboration on our docbook-based specification. There is a link in Kavi to a web interface to this repository. If OASIS wants to prohibit me from doing this, it had better provide me with a subversion, CVS or perforce repository to work with. Kavi is not a good development tool. I'm more than happy to use OASIS tools if they meet my needs. -Matt
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]