[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] RE: [members] OASIS member review of proposedrevision of TC Process
Will do. Ciao, Rex At 2:20 PM -0400 10/14/04, Karl F. Best wrote: >Rex, Norm, Matt, others: > >Thanks for the input and comments; I appreciate hearing your >responses to this. May I ask that you please send your formal >comments to the email list set up for this purpose? That way the >Board Process committee can (accountably) address comments made. > >As announced on the 11th: > >> Please send your comments in regards to these proposed changes to >> tcproc-member-review@lists.oasis-open.org by 10 November, so that >> the Board can consider your comments, make changes to this draft, >> and have the Process document ready to be effective at the same >> time as the new IPR Policy. > >thanks >-Karl > > >Rex Brooks wrote: >>The more I think about this, the more onerous it becomes. I >>understand the need to have accountability that is underneath this >>requirement, but compatibility with previous efforts tends to make >>it unworkable as an absolute restriction. There are also external >>efforts associated with TC standards efforts, such as FreebXML >>hosted on SourceForge, as are other efforts, where testbeds are >>required to test the workability and interoperability of standards, >>quite apart from associated collateral materials that we >>development as individuals or as companies, things like white >>papers, glossaries, etc., that are not strictly OASIS contributions >>but which form part of the bulwark of materials that support a >>standard or set of standards and are indispensable to promotion and >>adoption of a standard. >> >>This all requires much more thought. >> >>Ciao, >>Rex >> >>At 9:21 AM -0400 10/14/04, Norman Walsh wrote: >> >>>/ Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com> was heard to say: >>>| "All resources of the TC and its associated >>>| subcommittees, including web pages, documents, email >>>| lists and any other discussions, must be located only >>>| on facilities provided by OASIS; TCs and SCs may not >>>| conduct business or technical discussions, store >>>| documents, or host web pages on non-OASIS servers. All >>>| web pages, documents, and email archives of all TCs >>>| and SCs shall be publicly visible." >>>| >>>| So...will OASIS also be providing us with email accounts? I suggest >>>| softening this passage considerably because at the end of the day if >>>| OASIS restricts the tools we use, many of us will end up finding a >>>| new home for our standards work. >>> >>>Indeed. Quoting the message I sent to the review list[1] before I >>>noticed that discussion was taking place here: >>> >>>> All resources of the TC and its associated subcommittees, including >>>> web pages, documents, email lists and any other discussions, must be >>>> located only on facilities provided by OASIS; TCs and SCs may not >>>> conduct business or technical discussions, store documents, or host >>>> web pages on non-OASIS servers. >>>> >>>>By a strict interpretation of this clause, I am forbidden from >>>>mirroring the DocBook specifications and schemas on docbook.org. Is >>>>that the intent? Or is the intent merely that no TC content may appear >>>>solely on non-OASIS servers? >>>> >>>>Suppose a third party, unaffiliated with OASIS or the TC constructs >>>>such a mirror? Will OASIS pursue having those materials removed from >>>>the mirror? >>> >>> >>>I feel compelled also to note that this requirement places a >>>considerable burden on chairs and secretaries coming as it does in >>>advance of an improved (i.e. useful and workable) document repository >>>administered by OASIS. >>> >>> Be seeing you, >>> norm >>> >>>[1] >>>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tcproc-member-review/200410/msg00001.html >>> >>>-- >>>Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. >>>NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended >>>recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. >>>Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. >>>If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by >>>reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. >>> >>>Attachment converted: Enterprise:Untitled ( / ) (002F64D6) -- Rex Brooks GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison, Berkeley, CA, 94702 USA, Earth W3Address: http://www.starbourne.com Email: rexb@starbourne.com Tel: 510-849-2309 Fax: By Request
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]