[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [chairs] Of un-patents and un-inventions
David- Can you explain to me how your proposal is different than sites (and there are several, last time I looked) like the one you mention? Why is the PTO going to pay any more attention to this effort? While I do think it would be interesting for OASIS pursue something like this, I'd hate for it to be ignored just like previous efforts. -Gabe > -----Original Message----- > From: David Webber (XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info] > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 8:19 AM > To: Chairs OASIS > Subject: Re: [chairs] Of un-patents and un-inventions > > Elysa, > > I'm open to better suggestions! > > BTW - seems like the patent approach to this is > http://www.researchdisclosure.com/ > but again this IMHO falls into the same bear trap we are > trying to avoid - > eg - > this just sucks you down into the morass that is the USPTO - > we're trying to > ensure > we stay away from all that. > > I've had a suggest of other terms like "open invention", or > "freely reusable > idea". > > I also think we need "obvious and self-evident" in there too.... > > Thanks, DW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Elysa Jones" <ejones@warningsystems.com> > To: "David Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>; "Chairs OASIS" > <chairs@lists.oasis-open.org> > Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 10:57 AM > Subject: Re: [chairs] Of un-patents and un-inventions > > > > Except for the name, I think this is the best idea I have > heard yet wrt > IPR! > > Cheers, > > Elysa Jones, EM-TC > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]