[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [chairs] TC Process revisions released
I don't know if this was just added or if I simply missed it before, but I have a concern about the policy on maintaining voting status. The new policy [1] says that upon missing 2 out of 3 successive meetings, the member loses voting status -- period. It says a warning MAY be sent (not sure when -- after the first absence?), but that loss of voting status does not depend on such a warning. Under the current good standing policy, missing 2 out of 3 consecutive meetings results in a warning. Loss of voting status only occurs if the member misses the next meeting. That means that it takes missing 3 out of 4 meetings (and a warning) to lose status. I can see why removing the warning from the process is valuable. But the automatic loss of voting status after missing only 2 out of 3 meetings (rather than 3 out of 4) is, IMO, unreasonable, particularly given the lengthy and non-automatic process for regaining voting status. Normal "day job" requirements are likely to cause absence in 2 out of 3 meetings more often that the LOA process is designed to accommodate. -- Steve Anderson BMC Software [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process_2005.04.15.php#2.4 -----Original Message----- From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org] Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 10:36 PM To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org Cc: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org Subject: [chairs] TC Process revisions released The approved revised OASIS TC Process rules, effective 15 April 2005, are posted to the OASIS web site at [1], and on the effective date will also be moved to the main page for the TC Process at [2]. We will apply the effective date as follows: Any TC action that was initiated on or before 14 April will be able to complete that action according to the 2003 TC Process rules. Any action initiated on or after 15 April will be governed by the 2005 revisions. (So, for example, the three OASIS Standard ballots pending this month, announced 1 April, will complete under the old rules.) These rules, approved by our Board of Directors at their last meeting, generally follow the structure of Member Review Draft released last October (at [3]), although a number of additional revisions were made to take into account the comments we received from members during that review. A summary of the principal changes is appended below, and shortly will be posted to [4]. We will post a shorter form of this message to the [members] list on Friday as well. Also, for those of you who wish to track the changes more closely, I have attached an unofficial side-by-side parallel table of the 2005 and 2003 rulesets, in HTML and RTF formats. If this seems broadly useful, perhaps we also will post it on the website. It may be more detail than is generally needed. For now it is an informal, extra tool. We will discuss the key TC Process changes in the TC Chair F2F sessions scheduled during the upcoming OASIS Symposium, see schedule at [5], and in a series of global conference calls (as we've done before) shortly thereafter. A significant revision of the OASIS "TC Guidelines" also will be issued to reflect these updates. Of course, you're also welcome to contact Mary McRae or myself, your TC's designated Staff Contact, or any member of the OASIS staff with questions or comments. Best regards Jamie Clark ~ James Bryce Clark ~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS ~ jamie.clark@oasis-open.org [1] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process_2005.04.15.php [2] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php. [3] http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/members-only/download.php/9623/ TC%20Process20041007.pdf [4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/change_summary_2005.php (to be uploaded shortly) [5] http://www.oasis-open.org/events/symposium_2005/related_events.php#roberts_r ules ==== OASIS TC PROCESS CHANGE SUMMARY: 2005 This is a summary of the principal changes made to the September 2003 version of the OASIS TC Process. These changes were approved by the OASIS Board of Directors on 23 March 2005, effective 15 April 2005. NOTE this is not an exhaustive list, and this document is non-normative. TC attendance no longer affects TC Member status once achieved, nor subcommittee membership. Participants may be either Voting Members or non-voting Members of a TC. Once a person becomes a TC Member, they remain in that state until they resign or cease to be eligible. Attendance in a TC's activities only affects voting rights in the TC. Also, the attendance rules have been simplified slightly. Several changes have been made to TC launch and scoping rules: * A greater number of proposers is required to launch a TC. ("Minimum Membership" = at least 5 proposers, at least 2 of which must be from different organizational members.) * Participants who are employee representatives of an organizational OASIS member require confirmation from that organization when they join a TC as a Member. (Note that becoming a Member has consequences under the OASIS IPR Policy.) * In addition to the current right to "clarify" a charter, a new procedure for "rechartering" has been introduced to permit broader changes (such as expansion of the scope of a TC). The advancement process for specifications has been modified: * Specifications created by the TC but not yet approved are given a defined name: "Working Draft". * A TC may by a majority vote of all Voting Members (="Full Majority Vote") approve interim drafts as a "Committee Draft", to indicate transitional stability, and explicitly invoke the licensing obligations of members under the OASIS IPR Policy. Committee Drafts will not be the focus of publicity (though they will of course be publicly available). * When a TC gives its primary approval of a specification, we will once again call that document a "Committee Specification", as was the case previously. * Public reviews will be required prior to, not after, approval of a Committee Specification. * Initial public reviews of specifications will run for 60 days (increased from 30, in conformance with international practice), and any subsequent reviews for 15 days (reduced from 30). A number of quality-assurance practices have been added to the process. These include mandated use of specification templates and file naming practices, and more explicit rules around minimum public web page content, information resources and the like. Additional defined terms have been added for clarity. Various terms and cross-references have been updated to coordinate with the recent OASIS IPR Policy revisions. ====
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]