RE: [chairs] SCM plans?

["Wachob, Gabe" <gwachob@visa.com>]

Ostensibly, subversion has some chance of working through corporate HTTP
proxy-only firewalls, whereas CVS doesn't.

	-Gabe 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@nwalsh.com] 
> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:22 AM
> To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [chairs] SCM plans?
> 
> / "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> was heard to say:
> | Then we should focus on the SCM first.  CVS?  
> 
> Subversion?
> 
> Among subversion's nice features are the fact that commits are atomic
> and the fact that you can rename files and directories (preserving
> their history) with the standard tools. (Renaming a directory or file
> on CVS basically involves administrative access to the directory
> containing the repository.)
> 
> I've also heard interesting things about Arch and Mercurial which
> have a more distributed model.
> 
>                                         Be seeing you,
>                                           norm
> 
> -- 
> Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun 
> Microsystems, Inc.
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is 
> prohibited.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
> reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>