[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [chairs] SCM plans?
Ostensibly, subversion has some chance of working through corporate HTTP proxy-only firewalls, whereas CVS doesn't. -Gabe > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@nwalsh.com] > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:22 AM > To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [chairs] SCM plans? > > / "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com> was heard to say: > | Then we should focus on the SCM first. CVS? > > Subversion? > > Among subversion's nice features are the fact that commits are atomic > and the fact that you can rename files and directories (preserving > their history) with the standard tools. (Renaming a directory or file > on CVS basically involves administrative access to the directory > containing the repository.) > > I've also heard interesting things about Arch and Mercurial which > have a more distributed model. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun > Microsystems, Inc. > NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is > prohibited. > If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by > reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]