[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] TC FAQ Template
i would offer that a forum is better suited to (persistent) Q&A where a blog is more editorially oriented. since i thought that the purpose was to allow for some form of reusable public Q&A a forum would be the better choice in that it allows users to create topics that can start threads of discussion. b On Feb 14, 2006, at 12:20 PM, David RR Webber (XML) wrote: > Bill, > > OK - weeds, eh? > > The blogger environment allows you to create persistent html pages > - complete with archive and indexing - as well as the RSS content - > and Google search loves it all! > > DW > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [chairs] TC FAQ Template > From: Bill Parducci <bill.parducci@simulalabs.com> > Date: Tue, February 14, 2006 1:07 pm > To: Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com> > Cc: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > > without spinning to far out into the weeds i would suggest that a > forum would be a better solution here. the are searchable, > 'skinnable', can easily be setup to allow anonymous reads (good for > google searches ;o) while requiring authentication (read: "by signing > up you agree to abide by X "), typically have RSS feed capabilities > and allow you to keep things in some sort of order by topic. > > b
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]