[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] Draft Jan 2009 TC Process changes summary
Jim Hughes (LCA) wrote: > +1 to Jeff's comments. And we should be very precise with > terminology in these discussions... Then let's start with the word "specification." This is not a word that OASIS invented; believe it or not, it has a prior use in English. The ordinary English meaning of the word is: "a specific, explicit, or detailed mention, enumeration, or statement of something." As I said earlier in this thread, the word "specification" applies to a lot of things that we're going to be calling Notes. For example, the UBL Guidelines for Customization constitute "a specific, explicit, detailed mention, enumeration, and statement" of our guidelines for customization. The document is a specification of our guidelines. I would go so far as to say that *most* things that TCs are going to want to publish as "Committee Notes" are, in fact, specifications according to the ordinary English meaning of the word -- the meaning that speakers of English who are not OASIS members intend. This wouldn't be terribly important if we didn't make statements like this: > I'm not questioning the presence of Conformance Clauses, if you > have a specification - the point is that when we start talking > about them in the context of *non-specifications* it becomes > much murkier. This implicitly argues that because Notes are not Specifications in the special OASIS-only use of the word then they are not specifications in any sense of the word. This is not true, and it begs the question of what constitutes a specification. Try substituting the term "Non-standards-track Specifications" for "Notes" and see what happens to that argument. I'm not saying anything here about whether conformance clauses should be allowed in Notes. I'm saying that equivocation and arguing in circles is not a good way to sort this out. There may be a good reason to exclude conformance clauses from Notes, but it's not just because they're called Notes. Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]