I don't consider OpenDocument an authoring schema and I'm pretty sure we would create a modification so it was our own. ;)
Yes! I'd love it. But I can already begin to see the battle lines being drawn, i.e., which one (DITA, Docbook, OpenDocument, . . .)? From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:58 AM
To: Bob Freund
Cc: Dave Ings; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [chairs] What can Standards Development / TC Administration do to help? Agreed. How would the chairs feel about mandating all specs be created in an OASIS XML format?
m
On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:40 PM, Bob Freund wrote:
How much of this review might be automated? might be a lot if we had an xml publication format. On Apr 22, 2010, at 9:24 AM, Dave Ings wrote:
+1
This would really cut down on the iterative churn that seems to frustrate the people involved in the publication process. Great idea!
Regards, Dave Ings,
Emerging Software Standards
Email: ings@ca.ibm.com
Yahoo Messenger: dave_ings
<graycol.gif>Hanssens Bart ---2010/04/22 09:02:30 AM---> Would you like us to review your specifications prior to TC ballots so you don't need to go back a
From: Hanssens Bart <Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be>
To: Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org>, "chairs@lists.oasis-open.org" <chairs@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 2010/04/22 09:02 AM
Subject: RE: [chairs] What can Standards Development / TC Administration do to help?
> Would you like us to review your specifications prior to TC ballots so you don't need to go back and fix stuff afterwards?
That would be very helpful indeed, especially for new TC's / people submitting specifications for the first time...
Best regards
Bart
|