[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Errata process
Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> writes: > You can create as many draft errata as you like; they should be > cumulative. Once approved, the errata is noted on the standards page > along with the specification itself. You may also produce a merged > specification containing the errata so a user doesn't need to flip > between multiple documents. Thanks, but that doesn't address my concern about the serial nature of the review process or the six-month rule. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The irrational is not necessarily http://nwalsh.com/ | unreasonable.--Sir Lewis Namier
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]