[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [chairs] Committee Notes
You are rehearsing an argument which engaged the BoD for something like 2 years. The only I comment I have is that you can't please everyone. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Walsh [mailto:ndw@nwalsh.com] > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 11:13 AM > To: Mary McRae > Cc: members@lists.oasis-open.org; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [chairs] Committee Notes > > > Hi Mary, > > Having official non-standards track, non-normative committee > notes clearly > specified in the process is a good idea. But I must be > misunderstanding > the intent of Section 3 with respect to Committee Notes. > > Surely if the intent of the TC is to produce a non-normative note, the > informal result of some analysis, for example, or a collection of > examples, it's not necessary for a full-blown member review process. > But that's the way 3.2 reads. Perhaps that section could be clarified. > > If non-normative material requires the same level of review as > normative material, I think that's going to significantly impede the > ability of the TC to produce educational material that directly > benefits the community without imposing any standards burden. > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Through space the universe grasps me > http://nwalsh.com/ | and swallows me up like a speck; > | through thought I grasp it.-- Pascal >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]