Re: [chairs] Re: Committee Notes

[Jeff Mischkinsky <jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com>]

On Dec 13, 2010, at 8:47 AM, Norman Walsh wrote:

> Mary McRae <mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org> writes:
>> If it is a TC deliverable, then in order to reach Committee Note
>> status it must first be submitted for a 30-day public review.
>
> That's nuts. If it's non-normative, what purpose does the public
> review serve?
>
> I attempt to publish some non-normative examples and I get stuck in a
> 30, 45, 60, ... day limbo because someone doesn't like one of the
> examples.

Why would you get stuck anywhere?
Someone not liking an example, means they say they don't like it.  
That's no different than any other public review comment on any other  
document a TC produces.
The TC just has to process is like any other comment - no limbo AFAC  
see.
    Note: "thank you for comment, close no action" is an oft used  
response.

cheers,
   jeff

>
>                                        Be seeing you,
>                                          norm
>
> -- 
> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As the old hermit of Prague, that  
> never
> http://nwalsh.com/            | saw pen and ink, very wittily said to
>                              | the niece of King Gorboduc, 'That that
>                              | is, is'.-- Shakespeare

--
Jeff Mischkinsky			          		jeff.mischkinsky@oracle.com
Sr. Director, Oracle Fusion Middleware 				+1(650)506-1975
	and Web Services Standards           			500 Oracle Parkway, M/S 2OP9
Oracle								Redwood Shores, CA 94065