[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Committee Notes
The media relations policy has not been updated to reflect the current policy. Martin. > -----Original Message----- > From: robert_weir@us.ibm.com [mailto:robert_weir@us.ibm.com] > Sent: 14 December 2010 16:58 > To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [chairs] Re: Committee Notes > > Has anyone noticed the disconnect between the new TC Process and the Media > Relations Policy on external presentations? Not only do they require > different templates, but they require different level of approval. > > The FAQ on the TC Process says this: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process-faq.php > > "10. If a TC is preparing a slide presentation for a public event, does > the presentation really have to be classified and approved as a > Non-Standards Work Product, including the requirements to list all > contributors, have a statement about patents on every slide, require > public review, etc.? > Yes; however, a member of a TC may present material related to TC > activities that has been approved as a Committee Note Draft as long as the > status is properly conveyed and quality requirements in section 2.18 of > the TC Process Policy have been met." > > But the Media Relations Policy says this: > > http://www.oasis-open.org/news/media_relations_policy.php > > "Speaking on behalf of OASIS Committees > To speak publicly on behalf of an OASIS Committee, an individual should: > be a member of that Committee > notify and receive approval from the Committee chair > notify events@oasis-open.org prior to the event, so that staff can promote > the presentation on the OASIS Event Calendar and in OASIS News > format his/her presentation using the OASIS slide template > forward slides to events@oasis-open.org following the event for posting on > the OASIS Presentations Page." > > > So there is inconsistency as to whether I as a TC Chair, can give a > presentation "on behalf of an OASIS Committee" at a conference, without > putting the presentation into a non-existent Committee Note presentation > template and having it approved as a Committee Note Draft. > > I know I can avoid the issue altogether by using an IBM template and > giving the presentation that way. But IBM is already pretty well-known > these days. I'd rather take the opportunity to promote OASIS wherever > possible. I've done that in the past and have been able this way to lead > others to join OASIS. This is a good thing, I think. > > We should also keep in mind the needs of Adoption TCs, whose deliverables > mention in their charters not only include whitepapers and other printed > materials, but things such as approved logos, webinars, podcasts, etc. Do > we really want to require that a ODF podcast include a recitation of all > 20 members of the TC? Must we really deliver a podcast in HTML and PDF as > well as the original WAV file? Really? And how do we put a patent > statement on "every page" of a podcast? Stop every 30 seconds and say, > "We pause now for an important message from the OASIS Board of Directors" > ??? > > Regards, > > -Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]