FW: [cpexchange-wg] FW: CPExchange Conference Call Notes 6/12/01

[Ram Kumar <rkumar@msi.com.au>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Wyke, Allen [mailto:awyke@engage.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 7:58 AM
To: ''cpexchange-wg@yahoogroups.com' '
Subject: RE: [cpexchange-wg] FW: CPExchange Conference Call Notes
6/12/01


I think it is also worth nothing that there is a secondary option to merging
efforts. While I must admit I have not reviewed the CIQ efforts yet (doing
so thihs week), I expect we will find that there is a common core set of
functionality between CIQ and CPExchange. I am also guessing each will have
their own features specific to each implementation - otherwise, why would
the CIQ group being an effort after CPExchange was started?

In any case, a possible and probable solution is to provide an XSLT
tranformation between the standards. This would provide vendors/users the
ability to support each effort seemlessly. This also allows each group to
focus on areas they excel in, without having a merged and bloated standard.

I will send a more detailed list of comments hopefully by the end of the day
Friday.

Allen

-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart, Leonard
To: 'cpexchange-wg@yahoogroups.com'
Sent: 6/20/01 5:34 PM
Subject: RE: [cpexchange-wg] FW: CPExchange Conference Call Notes  6/12/01

Let me apologize to all for not being available for the conference call.
As
you may know GCA is in the middle of transitioning away from PIA (July
1),
and things have been a bit nuts for me trying to coordinate the project.

That stated,  Ron I think you and Ram are correct in terms of reviewing
possible synergies, and that option is currently under consideration by
the
membership.   That is why I commended OASIS-CIQ  site to the members of
the
group so folk with a much stronger technical bent than myself could look
at
the CIQ messages and use that as a criteria for assessing synergy.  Once
we
make such an assessment, we can determine the specifics of any
integration
strategy that we would propose.  So the long and short of it is the
option
remains open, we very much want to have dialogue with OASIS, but want to
make sure we have an intelligent dialogue.


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Schmelzer [mailto:rschmelzer@zapthink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:01 PM
To: cpexchange-wg@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [cpexchange-wg] FW: CPExchange Conference Call Notes
6/12/01


While I didn't participate in the conference call, I have been urging
CPExchange to consider efforts to merge its activities with OASIS. I am
not
sure what the direction of the CPexchange group is, but I would highly
recommend we at least get together with the CIQ group at OASIS and
identify
points of synergy. I participated in an earlier conference call when we
decided that we would evaluate the opportunity to merge efforts. I am
not
sure what happened to that option.

If anyone wants to discuss this further with me, please do send me email
at
rschmelzer@zapthink.com. For the record, ZapThink supports a merger of
efforts between CPExchange and OASIS for a number of reasons including
momentum, current stage of development, and the impact that OASIS has in
the
standards arena.

Ron
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ram Kumar" <rkumar@msi.com.au>
To: <cpexchange-wg@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 8:05 PM
Subject: RE: [cpexchange-wg] FW: CPExchange Conference Call Notes
6/12/01


> Hi all
>
> I quote the following text from the conference call notes:
> "All agreed that we should look into what OASIS has accomplished, to
get
> ideas for our next version.  However, we should keep the specs apart.
As
> one of Leonard's action items, he scanned the OASIS site and e-mailed
the
> group a list of the four (4) standards to view, and to be discussed at
the
> next conference call or WEBEX conference. "
>
> I am  keen to know what CPExchange has decided regarding working with
OASIS.
> >From the above text, it appears to me
> that CPExchange wants to maintains its independent direction despite
knowing
> that there is lot of synergy in work between
> OASIS and CPExchange. Please advise.
>
> Regards
>
> Ram
> Chair
> CIQ TC
> OASIS
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gillespie, Rosemary F. [mailto:rgillespie@printing.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:14 AM
> > To: 'cpexchange-wg@yahoogroups.com'
> > Subject: [cpexchange-wg] FW: CPExchange Conference Call
> > Notes  6/12/01
> >
> >  << File: Doc3_.doc >>
>
>
> To Post a message, send it to:   cpexchange-wg@eGroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
< http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
>
>
>



Yahoo! Groups Sponsor



<
http://rd.yahoo.com/M=201903.1435627.3015748.304267/S=1702208620:N/A=590
948
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=201903.1435627.3015748.304267/S=1702208620:N/A=59
0948>
/R=2/*
http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?ydomains+merchant-ad:dmad/M=20190
<http://store.yahoo.com/cgi-bin/clink?ydomains+merchant-ad:dmad/M=20190>

3.1435627.3015748.304267/S=1702208620:N/A=590948/R=3/992995531+
http://domain <http://domain>
s.yahoo.com/>
www.
src=

To Post a message, send it to:   cpexchange-wg@eGroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
< http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> Service.




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=190481.1491588.3061929.2/S=1702208620:N/A=613957/
?http://www.neway.org> www.newaydirect.com

<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=190481.1491588.3061929.2/D=egroupmail/
S=1702208620:N/A=613957/rand=342803685>

To Post a message, send it to:   cpexchange-wg@eGroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

To Post a message, send it to:   cpexchange-wg@eGroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/