RE: [ciq] Discussion: Levels of addresses

[Ram Kumar <rkumar@msi.com.au>]

Valid point from David.

Ram

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David RR Webber - XMLGlobal [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
> Sent: Monday, 29 April 2002 12:48 PM
> To: Ram Kumar
> Cc: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ciq] Discussion: Levels of addresses
> 
> 
> Ram,
> 
> Just some clarifications - yes indeed - the vision here is that
> CIQ provides the depth to Level 4 - but provides the
> subset at the levels 0 - 3 - driven by alignment with the
> legacy formats that are aimed at these other levels.
> 
> The goal is to reduce the business overhead (cost) in
> adopting CIQ at Levels 0 thru 3, - since adoption of
> standards is driven by how well the adoption of them
> matches the business needs.
> 
> Thanks, DW.
> ====================================================
> Message text written by Ram Kumar
> > 
> CIQ TC
> 
> I had a look at David's PPT material on different addressing levels.
> It does make sense to have this different levels. Though in 
> one picture
> it is shown that CIQ falls into level 4, the case is that CIQ 
> covers level
> 0-3
> also as it provides the flexibility to define addresses
> at an abstract or detailed level (though it is not explicit). 
> This is where
> we can make CIQ explicit to show different levels which can 
> make the life
> of the users easy in many ways.
> <
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>