[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cmis-browser] Ordery Schema and referencing
Thanks Jens,
I don't have any ideas except just denormalizing and not using refs at all - and that would be very cumbersome,
I did reach out to Lloyd Hilaiel again this morning to ask him to look at my previous email which was just to confirm he was ok with inclusion of Orderly in the appendix. From the first response I got from him in which he said "I would be willing to work with you to make sure you could use orderly for this project in the way you want with a minimal amount of legal clutter." it seems he is flexible, but I am trying to close on the details. This is what I had said in the earlier emaill (the one he has not replied to yet).
Let's give him a day to respond to my reminder, and if that does not work, I would propose to use orderly@librelist.com to communicate ideas and questions
Hello Lloyd,
Thank you for the quick answer!
First, just to clarify, I don't propose to use any of the code though of course any of the vendors that implement or use the spec may be interested. But that is not really a spec issue.
As far as the design, what I would like us to do is just copy the description of Orderly into our specification, so for example we would have an Appendix A including the text from http://orderly-json.org/docs copied into it. Then, elsewhere in the specification we would use Orderly as a way of describing the details of the binding and we would even include an Orderly file downloadable from the OASIS site containing our schema. I am still having a conversation with the OASIS general counsel about this concept and maybe he will find some flaw in this idea but so far he thinks it is doable assuming you are in agreement of course. And of course we would want to include in our specification the right attribution of Orderly The reason for including the text in the spec itself and not just referring to http://orderly-json.org/docs is to make the specification self contained and not dependent on another document that is itself not (yet) a standard. Would you find such a way of using Orderly acceptable? Or do you have another idea?
Also, in the course of creating our schema we would want to bounce questions off you, or ideas for extending Orderly. For example, one of the committee members thought it would be useful to have a construct of map, and had a proposed syntax for that. Would you be agreeable to members of the subcommittee contacting you with such questions or ideas? We want to respect your time and how you would like such a conversation to work (using a mailing list for example?).
Finally, I would like to ask you to review our proposed schema from time to time and give us ideas for improvement.
To give you an idea on our timeline, the browser binding extension to CMIS is part of the CMIS 1.1 work and the expectation is that we would turn the proposal over to the editors by roughly March 2011 and then it goes into the OASIS spec editing and review cycle which will take most of 2011. So we would want our work on the description of Orderly and the schema complete by March 2011.
So how does all this sound?
Gregory Melahn
STSM
IBM Collaboration Solutions
melahn@us.ibm.com
919 254 0295
Jens Hübel ---11/30/2010 10:45:54 AM---Hi all,
From: | Jens Hübel <jhuebel@opentext.com> |
To: | <cmis-browser@lists.oasis-open.org> |
Date: | 11/30/2010 10:45 AM |
Subject: | [cmis-browser] Ordery Schema and referencing |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]