Re: [cmis] Groups - CMIS Part II - ReSTful AtomPub binding v.60 (CMISPart II -- ReSTful AtomPub Binding.doc) uploaded

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>]

Al Brown wrote:
 > Julian,
 >
 > It requires JAX-WS, JAXB, and junit + the latest eclipse.

The classpath file has lots of JAR references that do not seem to be 
included in those. It would *really* be helpful if there was a README 
telling readers what to do with it.

 >  >That being said, I'm not convinced that automatically generated 
code can
 >  >replace carefully written examples, in particular when it involves
 >  >questions like HTTP status codes, methods != GET/POST, response 
headers,
 >  >ETags and so on...
 >
 > Rest .6 does not have methods in it but describes the binding using 
resources and http verbs.  .6 and .5 have the same information in status

I was using "method" as in "HTTP method".

 > codes currently, in the same table.  Why should this specification 
include response headers, etags, etc when it is covered by the normative 
reference to HTTP and AtomPub?  Especially since there is nothing 
different/new about it in the rest binding?

I was talking about missing examples, not missing normative text (yet).

Of course we *could* get away without any single example, I just happen 
to believe it's a bad idea.

Best regards, Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH, Hafenweg 16, D-48155 Münster, Germany
Amtsgericht Münster: HRB5782