[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CMIS-115) Make use of"OperationNotSupported" vs. "ConstraintViolationException" more consistent
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=10270#action_10270 ]
Al Brown commented on CMIS-115:
-------------------------------
Accepted by TC
> Make use of "OperationNotSupported" vs. "ConstraintViolationException" more consistent
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CMIS-115
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-115
> Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Domain Model
> Affects Versions: Draft 0.50
> Reporter: Ethan Gur-esh
> Assignee: Ethan Gur-esh
> Priority: Minor
>
> Currently in the CMIS spec, we're a bit inconsistent about when to use "OperationNotSupportedException" vs. "ConstraintViolationException".
> For example:
> We said in the spec that OperationNotSupportedException is supposed to be about optional capabilities, and we usually use it that way... but we also throw it when:
> - You try to check in an object that is not checked out.
> - You try to delete the root folder.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]