OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cmis message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (CMIS-192) REST/Atom: Why do we have"TypesChildren" and "Types Descendants" collections?


REST/Atom: Why do we have "TypesChildren" and "Types Descendants" collections?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: CMIS-192
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-192
             Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: REST/AtomPub Binding
    Affects Versions: Draft 0.62
            Reporter: Ethan Gur-esh
            Assignee: Al Brown


In the CMIS domain model (Part I) and in the WS/SOAP binding, we said that there's a flat "types" collection returned by the getTypes method, and that the hierarchy of object types is not explicit (i.e. returned as a tree), but rather implicitly discoverable via the "ParentID" attribute of an object type.

However, in the REST/ATOM binding, there's a "TypesDescendants" collection that returns an actual hierarchy of types.

Why do we need/have this? If there's a use case for it, it should be part of the domain model & all bindings. If not, we should remove it from the REST/ATOM binding for consistency. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]