[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (CMIS-192) REST/Atom: Why do we have"TypesChildren" and "Types Descendants" collections?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-192?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Al Brown updated CMIS-192: -------------------------- Proposal: add to ws and p1 (was: add to ws) > REST/Atom: Why do we have "TypesChildren" and "Types Descendants" collections? > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CMIS-192 > URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-192 > Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: REST/AtomPub Binding > Affects Versions: Draft 0.62 > Reporter: Ethan Gur-esh > Assignee: Al Brown > Fix For: Draft 0.62 > > > In the CMIS domain model (Part I) and in the WS/SOAP binding, we said that there's a flat "types" collection returned by the getTypes method, and that the hierarchy of object types is not explicit (i.e. returned as a tree), but rather implicitly discoverable via the "ParentID" attribute of an object type. > However, in the REST/ATOM binding, there's a "TypesDescendants" collection that returns an actual hierarchy of types. > Why do we need/have this? If there's a use case for it, it should be part of the domain model & all bindings. If not, we should remove it from the REST/ATOM binding for consistency. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]