OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cmis message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CMIS-12) Non-operability of Draft0.50 WSDL with IBM WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) Tooling



    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16970#action_16970 ] 

Al Brown commented on CMIS-12:
------------------------------

JIRA Cleanup

> Non-operability of Draft 0.50 WSDL with IBM WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) Tooling
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CMIS-12
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-12
>             Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Web Services Binding
>    Affects Versions: Draft 0.50
>            Reporter: Gary Gershon
>             Fix For: Draft 0.60
>
>
> The Draft 0.50 WSDL files fail cross-WSDL file validation using the IBM WebSphere Integration Developer (WID) tool due to their current structure which utilizes the same target namespace in multiple WSDL files.
> Because of this, these WSDL files cannot be utilized in a WebSphere Process Server (WPS) or WebSphere ESB (WESB) environment to orchestrate (via BPEL) or mediate (via the enterprise service bus) CMIS Web services.
> WPS and WESB are the current standards-based IBM enterprise product offerings that support orchestration using BPEL and the ESB integration pattern.
> WID is the Eclipse-based IDE for programming WPS and WESB and is based on IBM's Rational Application Developer (RAD) product for Java (and other language) development.  I am using the most current version of WID: 6.1.2.
> It appears that while each CMIS WSDL file is valid by itself, when more than one WSDL is imported into a development project then each CMIS WSDL-defined fault (e.g. all the CMIS "Exceptions" that are defined for the service) results in an error:
> (From the IBM Help facility...)
> CWZXT0102E: There are messages that have the same name ({0}) in the same namespace ({1}).
> Explanation: For the project that uses this file to run on WebSphere Process Server, each message name in a namespace must be unique.
> User Action: Edit the WSDL file to ensure that the message names are unique in each namespace.
> such as:
> "There are messages that have the same name (ConstraintViolationException) in the same namespace (http://www.cmis.org/2008/05)."
> I was able to eliminate these errors by specifying a unique target namespace for each WSDL file, however, this solution will impact interoperability with the Draft 0.50 vendor test environments.
> Employing a unique target namespace for each WSDL file is common practice, as shown in the samples in the WSDL 1.2 specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-wsdl12-20030303/) Example 2:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
> <definitions name="TicketAgent" 
>     targetNamespace="http://airline.wsdl/ticketagent/"; 
>     xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; 
>     xmlns:tns="http://airline.wsdl/ticketagent/"; 
>     xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; xmlns:xsd1="http://airline/";> 
>     <import location="TicketAgent.xsd" namespace="http://airline/"/> 
> where the WSDL file has a target namespace suffixed with the name of the service, which is thus a different namespace from the domain model namespace.
> (This naming pattern appears to be why some of the CMIS 0.50 WSDL files had developer notes indicating they could not use <import> for the schema -- which was due to the schema requirement to use <include> when the namespaces are the same, and <import> when the namespaces are different.)
> I think this is a significant issue because I don't think CMIS could go to market if it could not be used to access documents for customers in IBM BPM or EAI environments.
> Pending further discussion, my recommendation would be that CMIS should adopt the common pattern of using a unique target namespace in each WSDL file.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]