[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CMIS-646) cmis:objectTypeIdshould not be required for documents

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-646?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17809#action_17809 ] 

Florent Guillaume commented on CMIS-646:
----------------------------------------

Why shouldn't cmis:objectTypeId be required? It's a very basic property.
IMHO it should be required for all objects, as well as cmis:objectId and cmis:baseTypeId at the very least.
Otherwise you make life quite hard for clients.


> cmis:objectTypeId should not be required for documents
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CMIS-646
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-646
>             Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Domain Model
>    Affects Versions: Draft 0.70
>            Reporter: Florian Mueller
>            Assignee: Ethan Gur-esh
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Section 2.1.4.3.3 "Property Definitions" states that the property cmis:objectTypeId is required for documents. That looks like an oversight. cmis:objectTypeId should not be required and is not required for all other base types.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira