[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CMIS-763) Discussion - Should CMIS 1.2 features only be defined for the browser binding?
[ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-763?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=36172#action_36172 ]
David Choy commented on CMIS-763:
---------------------------------
A consensus opinion at the 16 Dec 2013 meeting:
The next CMIS release should be labeled "Version 2.0". It is to include the Browser Binding and the AtomPub Binding, but not the WS Binding. A v2.0 CMIS compliant repository MUST support v1.0 and v1.1 AtomPub Binding and v1.1 Browser Binding, and SHOULD support v1.0 and v1.1 WS Binding.
> Discussion - Should CMIS 1.2 features only be defined for the browser binding?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CMIS-763
> URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CMIS-763
> Project: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services (CMIS) TC
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Browser Binding
> Affects Versions: Proposals for 2.0
> Reporter: Jay Brown
>
> Please discuss here as to whether we should stop adding new features to the AtomPub and WS bindings for all versions > 1.1.
> E.g. All new features will be supported in the Browser Binding only if yes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]