[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Relationship with ISO 11179
The model and approach used seems to be an implementation of Parts 1 and 2 of ISO 11179, and yet no mention is made in the draft recommendation of this provenance. My questions/concerns are therefore: - if it is intended to be an implementation of ISO 11179 Parts 1 and 2, why is no mention made? Could you point to how and where the specification coincides with or differs from the ISO standard? - if it is not intended to implement or leverage ISO 11179, was this standard at least examined in the course of the TC's work? what were the reasons for not explicitly working with it? Our primary concern is to establish what the advantages and issues would be for an implementer to use the proposed specification rather than ISO 11179 and/or - if they are not orthogonal - what the relationships between them are. Regards, Peter ------------- Peter F Brown Founder, Pensive.eu Chair, CEN eGovernment Focus Group Co-Editor, OASIS SOA Reference Model Lecturer at XML Summer School --- Personal: +43 676 610 0250 http://public.xdi.org/=Peter.Brown <http://public.xdi.org/=Peter.Brown> www.XMLbyStealth.net <outbind://27-000000008C6806EF49E04B4A90164225E8D1573507001B2253B0359130 439EA571FF30251AAE0000000063FF00001B2253B0359130439EA571FF30251AAE000000 013DB00000/www.XMLbyStealth.net> www.xmlsummerschool.com <outbind://27-000000008C6806EF49E04B4A90164225E8D1573507001B2253B0359130 439EA571FF30251AAE0000000063FF00001B2253B0359130439EA571FF30251AAE000000 013DB00000/www.xmlsummerschool.com>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]