Re: [codelist] RE: Can HTML version of genericode documents be (OpenOffice) HTML rather than XHTML?

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

Thanks for the heads-up, Mary, about the problems.

Since we didn't make last week's deadline, this means that we will 
have to push back on the July 10 meeting.  What this then means is 
that according to the Process section 3.4 we will not make the July 
15 deadline for getting genericode out for OASIS Standard 
consideration and voting by August 1.  The standardization is pushed 
back a month, or longer if we have continuing problems creating the HTML.

Mary, the Process sections 1(dd) and 2.18 regarding conformance 
clauses are for Committee Specifications finalized after 1 June 2007 
... I either misread or misunderstood this to exclude anything in 
progress by that date so I thought our specification was 
exempt.  This came to my attention last week at the UBL 
face-to-face.  The Committee Draft we finalized does not have a 
conformance clause and this has not been flagged as a problem.  Can 
you confirm if the text you have is satisfactory or not?

I would like to still go ahead with the public review and if we 
discover the lack of the conformance section will prevent this 
document going from Draft to Specification then that can be treated 
as a comment.  If the addition of a Conformance Clause is considered 
substantive (not sure on my part, since the actual document model 
specification doesn't change), then we can add it and have a second 
public review for 15 days and still make the deadline for September 
voting, assuming we get over the HTML problems by Monday:

   Public review start:  21 May 2007
   Public review end:    20 July 2007 (60 days)
   Committee meeting:    24 July 2007
   Public review start:  27 July 2007
   Public review end:    11 August 2007 (15 days)
   Committee meeting:    14 August 2007
   OASIS voting start:   1 September 2007

So, with effort, we can get to our objective only one month later 
than we discussed at our meeting last week.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken

At 2007-05-17 09:29 -0400, Mary McRae wrote:

>They're both pretty awful - I've been trying to get a decent HTML 
>conversion of
>your files out of ODF using a number of approaches:
>a) save as HTML
>b) save as XHTML
>c) save as doc, open in Word, save as HTML ...
>d) save as office 2003 xml, open in Word, save as HTML ...
>e) open ODT in Word using plug-in, save as HTML ...
>
>none of which have been successful. I've also been in contact with someone at
>the OpenDocument Fellowship to see if their odf2xhtml converter is
>same/better/worse and will be experimenting.
>
>Maybe I'll try saving the PDF as HTML next ...
>
>(once I get to HTML I use the Tidy Online converter to clean-up/turn 
>into XHTML)
>
>Mary


--
Upcoming hands-on training(Europe 2007): XSL-FO Jun 11; UBL Oct 01
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training
RSS feeds:     publicly-available developer resources and training
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0    +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal