[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [codelist] genericode element naming: LocationUri versus LocationUrl
At 2007-08-13 12:53 +0100, Anthony B. Coates (Miley Watts) wrote: >The existing text says that the 'LocationUri' must point to a genericode >document. I know this. >It would be problematic for validation if we had no control >over the format of files retrieved from code list and column set >references, and would undermine what we could demand in terms of >conformance. I was thinking about a server-side procedure to emit a database table as genericode XML. I understand it is possible to have such on-the-fly transformation. But even without that, a virtual file system could be addressed by a URN instead of URL, so having the name be "URI" seems really appropriate to me. . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken >Cheers, Tony. > >On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:40:25 +0100, G. Ken Holman ><gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> wrote: > >>I think the old LocationUri is best because a system's URI resolver may >>accept a URI as an acceptable de-referenced representation of a virtual >>location. >> >>What if, say, one of the locations is a database lookup table? >> >>. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Upcoming public training: XSLT/XSL-FO Sep 10, UBL/code lists Oct 1 World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Jul'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]