[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Revised specification draft posted: Context/Value Association
Fellow CLRTC members, I've just posted the latest revision to the Context/Value Association file format specification as a preliminary ZIP file at: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=25875 This replaces the former Schematron-based Value Validation Using Genericode methodology (itself a replacement of the UBL Methodology for Code List and Value Validation). Changes from the previous version include: - new project name: Context/Value Association - focus is the file format of association, not a validation methodology - validation only referenced as an example application of CVA files - masquerading meta data changed to mimic genericode Identification - changed case of names from "...URI" to "...Uri" to match genericode - removed references to UBL (though some UBL-based examples are still present) Based on some discussions with OASIS staff, the specification's "Locations:" entries for the XSD files that you see now in the document will be removed, and the reader of the document will rely on the namespace RDDL document to locate the XSD files. The temporary ZIP file locations will also be removed from the specification once it is finalized because the documents will be found in the CLRTC repository, not the Kagi repository. Until such time as a committee draft becomes available on the OASIS site, these preliminary ZIP files contain an "xsd-temp" directory where you will find a draft of the namespace RDDL index.html document, and the latest drafts of the XSD schema. When this moves to committee draft these files will be posted in the CLRTC repository. I don't expect committee members to have read through the specification in detail before Tuesday's teleconference, but could you please skim it before the meeting starts? This is far far shorter than the earlier documents because it doesn't have any validation stylesheet details, as they were ruled out of scope in our earlier discussions. I would like to know if the new focus and revised content meets with the directions anticipated by committee members. If so, then I'll work on polishing this into a committee draft. For those interested in using OASIS context/value association files for XML document validation, I've released the Schematron-based suite of stylesheets as a free Crane developer resource. Follow the "Free resources" link from our home page cited in my trailer below. This move supports the committee comments that supporting stylesheets is not a committee function and that the committee should focus solely on file format specifications and not any biased implementations of those specifications. In this way others might be inspired to create alternative implementations of committee file format specifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- Comprehensive in-depth XSLT2/XSL-FO1.1 classes: Austin TX,Jan-2008 World-wide corporate, govt. & user group XML, XSL and UBL training RSS feeds: publicly-available developer resources and training G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/ Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995) Male Cancer Awareness Jul'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]