OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

coel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [coel] BAP uploaded

Hi Joss,

I'm just reviewing your changes and noticed that you use 'WILL' rather than 'SHALL' which is the appropriate keyword from RFC2119. I've also stumbled upon a misspelt abbreviation. I'll upload a corrected version shortly.

You are right that the specification does not explicitly state that scheme 1 is a minimum. Although it is possible to logically derive 'B' from 'A' I think we should make it clearer for the reader and state B. I'll put in some appropriate words and also elevate the use of authentication to a MUST. I'll upload a revised copy later this morning.

I'm not sure what you mean by your 'migrating' question: We have bee applying changes to the documents under new 'WD02' names and I understand that these will form the basis of the next draft. Have I missed something?



Dr. Paul Bruton

Chadwick House, Birchwood Park, Warrington, WA3 6AE
Paul.Bruton@tessella.com, T: +44 (0)7557 916535
www.tessella.com    Registered in England No. 1466429

Please consider the environment and do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.

This message is commercial in confidence and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised and strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please inform the sender immediately. Please note that messages sent or received by the Tessella e-mail system may be monitored and stored in an information retrieval system.

From:        Joss <Joss@activinsights.co.uk>
To:        "coel@lists.oasis-open.org" <coel@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:        02/02/2016 07:25
Subject:        [coel] BAP uploaded
Sent by:        <coel@lists.oasis-open.org>

I’d just uploaded the BAP with some simple additions for COEL-50.


A couple of questions:

·         On the BAP – in 2.2.2 I can see scheme 1 & scheme 2 for posting atoms but I’m not sure that it says scheme 1 MUST be implemented as a minimum. Also in 2.3 it suggests that it is OK to run scheme 2 with anonymous TLS only – do we really want people to do this? I assumed that we would be looking at scheme 1 with anonymous TLS only as a minimum and scheme 2 with authentication as an option.

·         Generally, now that we have a published committee specification, should we be migrating our WD2 changes on these originals?






Joss Langford

Technical Director

Activinsights Ltd


Tel: 01480 862080

MBL 07712 886208



Important Information:  The contents of this email are intended for the named addresses only and contain information which is confidential and which may also be privileged.  Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy,  use it, or disclose it to anyone else.  If you received it in error, please notify us immediately at enquiries@activinsights.co.uk and then destroy it.  Further, whilst we make efforts to keep our network free from computer viruses, etc., you do need to check this email and any attachments to it for viruses as we can take no responsibility for any viruses which might be transferred by way of this email.


Activinsights Limited, Unit 11, Harvard Industrial Estate, Kimbolton, Cambs, PE28 0NJ.  A company registered in England & Wales. Registered number: 06576069


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]