[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [coel] Question on the length of the public review
From: | dave.snelling@uk.fujitsu.com |
To: | "Chet Ensign" <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org>, coel@lists.oasis-open.org |
Cc: | "Paul Knight" <paul.knight@oasis-open.org> |
Date: | Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:26 |
Subject: | RE: [coel] Question on the length of the public review |
Chet,
I would go with another full 30 day review. 1) We did add substantial content, and 2) I wasn’t really happy with the level of comment
we got – want to push harder this time.
Matt, Joss, and Paul, chime in if you (dis)agree.
Dr. David Snelling
Fujitsu Distinguished Engineer
Program Director Artificial Intelligence
CTO Office EMEIA
Fujitsu
Mob: +44 (0) 7590-293439
Email:
Dave.Snelling@UK.Fujitsu.com
Web:
uk.fujitsu.com
Fujitsu is proud to partner with
Action for Children
P
Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email?
From: coel@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:coel@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Chet Ensign
Sent: Monday, December 4, 2017 8:59 PM
To: coel@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Paul Knight <paul.knight@oasis-open.org>
Subject: [coel] Question on the length of the public review
Members of the COEL TC,
We are prepping your 2nd public review package now.
Normally, subsequent public reviews are run for a minimum of 15 days. However, given that you extensively reorganized the original materials into a single document, I'm checking to see if you would like me to run it for longer.
Thanks - we'll get the review started this week either way...
/chet
----------------
Chet Ensign
Director of Standards Development and TC Administration
OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society
http://www.oasis-open.org
Primary: +1 973-996-2298
Mobile: +1 201-341-1393
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]