[controlled-trade] Re: [controlled-trade-comment] CTML VocabularyTemplate

[Todd Harbour <toddh@fgm.com>]

You got it! if you are up for writing a new schema that would be fantastic.
Russ and I just finished a pretty exciting session. Our plan is to knock out
a UML model of the ideas, capture the definitions, and get them out for
dissemination (all before lunch :-) (maybe).

On 7/2/02 08:57 AM, "Golding Glenn (Mr GWE)" <Glenn.Golding@dti.gsi.gov.uk>
wrote:

> Todd
> 
> You start work way too early :-)!
> 
> If you like to send me what you've got so far, I'll try to figure ways of
> bringing in ELVIS, etc.  If we really are going to be limited to flat
> documents, then I guess I'd think in terms of HTML to provide the
> navigation, etc.  XML would better though and I would have thought there was
> already a suitable schema around - I'm certainly not up to writing one!
> 
> Glenn 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Todd Harbour [mailto:toddh@fgm.com]
> Sent: 02 July 2002 13:13
> To: Glenn Golding
> Cc: Dale Barone; Steven Saboe
> Subject: Re: [controlled-trade-comment] CTML Vocabulary Template
> 
> 
> This sounds good to me. We have been pulling together CTML vocabulary and
> dropping it into an OASIS document. Just like we discussed, the document
> approach definitely has its limitations, and if we can come up with registry
> concept, that would be even better. No matter where we are with the
> vocabulary work, I would like to send you a copy so that you can see what
> our thinking is. How would you anticipate laying in ELATE and ELVIS concepts
> (in the absence of a registry)?
> 
> On 7/2/02 07:11 AM, "Golding Glenn (Mr GWE)" <Glenn.Golding@dti.gsi.gov.uk>
> wrote:
> 
>> Todd
>> 
>> Apologies for the delayed response.
>> 
>> We've spoken about this a couple of times.  I think the first requirement
> is
>> some sort of registry to hold the vocabulary terms, synonyms,
> relationships,
>> etc.  I have some ideas about how we might go about this (the DoD Data
>> Emporium is an excellent example) but I'm sure we some XML practitioners
> on
>> board the TC that can offer far more well-informed advice than I.
>> 
>> Once we have a registry in place, I suggest we each add our own
>> contributions - be they new items or comments on material that has already
>> been posted.  I guess someone would need to act as Moderator - yourself,
>> perhaps ;-).
>> 
>> What do others think?
>> 
>> Glenn
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Todd Harbour [mailto:toddh@fgm.com]
>> Sent: 27 June 2002 13:19
>> To: CTML (Public)
>> Cc: Dale Barone
>> Subject: [controlled-trade-comment] CTML Vocabulary Template
>> 
>> 
>> I spoke with Karl Best at OASIS yesterday about templates. Several people
> in
>> the group have indicated that the existing templates do not necessarily
>> reflect the type of work that we discussed at our kickoff meeting. I would
>> agree. The templates as they are now reflect a more mature specification
>> process and stage than where we are now. With that being said, I asked
> Karl
>> if it were OK to use the template as-is, making changes to accommodate our
>> needs, then as we mature in our own work, migrate the content to reflect
> the
>> recommended template. To me, this would mean having a body that reflects
> our
>> vocabulary work (right now), then we could move that to an attachment as
> we
>> move farther along in the future, conforming to the outline. How do people
>> feel about this approach?
>> 
>> On related issue, I've begun pulling together vocabulary that is germane
> to
>> the export control domain. I know that Glenn has done a large amount of
> work
>> in this area too. When I get our piece together, I'll post my work on the
>> CTML web site, where everyone can have at it (life with a bulls eye on
> your
>> head can be touch sometimes ;-)
>> 
>> Glenn: how shall we coordinate your work? What sounds reasonable?
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
>> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>> 
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> The original of this email has been scanned for viruses by the Government
>> Secure Intranet (GSI) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable
> &
>> Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
>> 
>> GSI users - for further details, please contact the GSI Nerve Centre, or
>> browse GNC 003/2002 at http://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/new2002notices.htm
>> 
>> In case of problems, please call your organisations IT helpdesk.
>> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________________________________________________
> The original of this email has been scanned for viruses by the Government
> Secure Intranet (GSI) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable &
> Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
> 
> GSI users - for further details, please contact the GSI Nerve Centre, or
> browse GNC 003/2002 at http://www.gsi.gov.uk/main/new2002notices.htm
> 
> In case of problems, please call your organisations IT helpdesk.
>