[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [courtfiling-cert] Court Filing 1.1 vendor compliance proposal
I
agree with the suggested approach, with the addition that if the "comments in
reaction" that the TC posts are clearly in opposition to the claims of the
vendor, that the vendor not be permitted to make such claims. This is not
saying that the TC would officially approve the claim, for the reason described
below. But, somehow there should be a mechanism so that the act of
reporting to the TC and allowing the TC to post comments does not result in a
vendor whose implementation clearly has made major modifications to a Court
Filing 1.1 standard that were not needed or justified in the the opinion of TC
members does not still get to make claims regarding Court Filing 1.1
implementation. I believe active TC members who have Court Filing 1.1
implementations would be able to meet this criteria.
Catherine Krause
E-Filing Project Manager
King County Department of Judicial
Administration
(206)296-7860
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]