[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Use Case Comments 2 of 4 - wd-LegalXML-Court-Filing-Blue-02
|
General Comments: Overall, it is a job
done well! In 1.1 Consider moving from
Component Vocabulary to a more implementation neutral term such as Major Design
Element (MDE). Consider thinking
about the placement of function to allocated across MDEs as a Functional Design
Element (FDE). (These will free up
component to be used in a more industry standard way.) In 2.1 Expand the term filer
- to cover the court and court staff filing outbound or find new term to cover
the concept. Regards, Don Donald L. Bergeron From: Bergeron, Donald
L. (LNG-DAY) General Comments: Overall, it is a job
done well! In 1.1 Consider moving from
Component Vocabulary to a more implementation neutral term such as Major Design
Element (MDE). Consider thinking
about the placement of function to allocated across MDEs as a Functional Design
Element (FDE). (These will free up
component to be used in a more industry standard way.) In 2.1 Expand the term filer
- to cover the court and court staff filing outbound or find new term to cover
the concept. In
2.3, 2.5 New
Extension: Support
a two phase process payment Phase
1 confirm payment request validity. Phase
2 process payment after confirmation from the Reviewing Clerk Support
rejection during phase 2 with communication to clerk Regards, Don Donald L. Bergeron |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]