I have reviewed Scott’s list of
issues. To the extent that I
understand the issues, I have no objections to any of the changes he has made
or suggested.
On defendantNumber, I take it that the
proposed mapping is to a GJXDM element that we have already used for another
purpose. Why not create our own
extension element?
I would be glad to participate in a
conference call at a time tomorrow convenient for everyone. I can make any time during the day or
evening work if I have sufficient notice.
I will not have email access during the working day (Pacific time) but
can be reached on my cell phone to confirm a time.
I am concerned about when we will have a
product for Tom to deliver to Joint Tech electronically prior to the meeting on
the 10th.
From: Scott Came [mailto:scott@justiceintegration.com]
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 3:37
PM
To:
courtfiling-reqts@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [courtfiling-reqts]
Status, artifacts, issues
As you've all seen, I
just posted a new baseline of the domain model and mapping to the main TC KAVI
area.
The consolidation work and cleanup raised a number of issues, in the attached.
Also attached is a list of changes that were made to the criminal and traffic
models, to improve consistency and reuse of structures across the message
models. (John and I had a conversation about this yesterday and decided some
refactoring would be worth the effort.) I have saved baselines along the way,
so none of the changes are set in stone. I believe they do make the models (and
mappings) clearer, more consistent, and less error-prone.
Our biggest remaining gaps are:
* Finishing up the juvenile model and mapping (still some gaps there...Jim, I
have highlighted some issues for you in the attached issues file, at the top)
* Modeling and mapping GetCaseQuery
* Domain expert review of the consolidated models and all of the mappings (esp
criminal, traffic, and juvenile)
I have not begun creating schemas. I've flat run out of time this weekend, and
also do not want to spend time on them if there are additional changes to the
mappings. I would guess it will take 6-8 hours to create the schemas from the
mappings.
I also agreed with John that I would produce a short (1-2 page) description of
the ECF 3.0 architecture, for inclusion in the IEPD overview document. Look for
that mid-week.
Thanks everyone.
--Scott