[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [csaf] Re: ISO vs. ITU
Submission request to advance OData v4.0 and OData JSON Format v4.0 to an International Standard Date: May 16, 2013 Any submission request delivered to the OASIS President under this policy must be in writing, and must include the following: The name(s) of the submission requester(s), that is, the TC, the Member Section, or the OASIS Organizational Members that support the submission request as described in section 1(d). OASIS OData (Open Data Protocol) Technical Committee The name of the intended receiving standards organization. The request may also suggest the committee or group in that organization which should process that submission. ISO/IEC JTC 1 Secretariat (no particular JTC 1 Subcommittee is identified at this time) The intended status or outcome that the request seeks from the receiving organization's process; and a short description of the receiving organization's approval process, including estimated time required, stages of approval and who votes at each stage. Intended status: Advance OData v4.0 and OData JSON Format v4.0 OASIS Standards incorporating OASIS Approved Errata to an ISO/IEC International Standard Process: ISO/IEC JTC 1 PAS Transposition Process involving a Draft International Standard (DIS) ballot followed by a Ballot Resolution Meeting (BRM) (if there are comments during ballots), and potentially a Final DIS (FDIS) Ballot. Stages of approval: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development/resources-for-technical-work/stages_table.htm%23s40 An explanation of how the submission will benefit OASIS. Advancing OData v4.0 and OData JSON Format v4.0 to an international standard draws international attention to the work done by OASIS and to the organization itself, and governments/regulators may be more inclined to use the standard because of its ISO/IEC status. This will help nurture and expand the ongoing liaisons with ISO/IEC JTC 1. Further, this submission will help maintain OASIS in good standing as a recognized ISO/IEC JTC 1 PAS submitter organization. The expected licensing, copyright and other intellectual property terms that will be used by the receiving organization in regard to the submission. ISO/IEC JTC 1 will expect that OASIS will abide by the ISO/IEC/ITU-T Common Patent Policy (indicated by at least notifying ISO/IEC of any patent declarations in the required Explanatory Report), and will provide ISO/IEC with sufficient copyright license to modify and publish the resulting ISO/IEC Standard. As these items have already been agreed with ISO/IEC JTC 1 when OASIS was approved as a PAS Submitter, no new issues are expected. A statement of the intended future plans for versioning and maintenance of the OASIS Standard and/or Approved Errata for that standard, and the expected roles of OASIS and the receiving organization. This must include clear statements of the rules of the receiving organization applicable to maintenance of an approved submitted standard, and to future versions of that standard; any requirements regarding the submission of future versions; and a description of how OASIS and the submission requesters expect to comply with those rules. The OASIS OData Technical Committee will continue to maintain the OData v4.0 and OData JSON Format v4.0 OASIS Standards and produce future revisions of them. For this specific submission (OData v4.0 and OData JSON Format v4.0 OASIS Standards incorporating OASIS Approved Errata) to ISO/IEC JTC 1, OASIS will request to be named the ÃâÅJTC 1 designated maintenance groupÃâ and will follow the required maintenance procedures (including Systematic Review). In the course of time, if there are substantive changes to OData v4.0 and OData JSON Format v4.0 (either via the Approved Errata process or through a new version), OASIS may submit the modified document (or future version) to ISO/IEC JTC 1 at some point in the future.
Hi Jamie,could you please tell us which OASIS standards / specifications have been submitted toa) ISOb) ITU?Which one would you recommend for CSAF and why?Best regards,Thomas
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]