[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] CybOX Object Survey
Hi Jerome,
I like the idea of tags – assuming we can agree to a fairly limited, normalized set of tags, I think they would be easily indexable (searchable), and useful for potentially creating trees or other groupings further down the road. I’ve created a new issue
in our GitHub tracker to keep track of this general topic [1], so I suggest that we share any specific tags, use cases, etc. there.
Going forward, until we come up with a better solution, I’m inclined to use GitHub as the central repository for tracking these issues and discussions. Doing so by email is just painful and not really workable, and the wiki is a bit cumbersome and hard
to use.
Regards,
Ivan
From: Jerome Athias
Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 9:57 AM To: Ivan Kirillov Cc: "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org" Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] CybOX Object Survey Hi,
While categorization, grouping or trees of objects is difficult due to numerous potential use cases, I found internal tagging of the objects an interesting approach. (E.g. With keywords like reverse engineering, forensics, pcap, etc.)
It could help identifying use cases, and attract potential new interests/adopters.
Furthermore, tagging ( or relationships ;)) with common tools, and tools ouputs mapping with the objects/properties could also help interest/adoption, and while showing quality (RFC based, etc.) and completeness (or not) of the objects, would help to build
bindings/convention tools.
E.g. Sysinternals2CybOX, wireshark2CybOX, etc.
In case of interest, how could we share tags, use cases, tools lists and mappings?
Best regards
On Monday, August 3, 2015, Kirillov, Ivan A. <ikirillov@mitre.org> wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]