[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: CybOX 3.0: HashType Refactoring
This Hash refactoring seems to parallel the IP Address refactoring. Would it make sense to treat hashes the same way we treat IP Addresses?
{
"file" : {
"hashes" : [
{
"hash": "3773a88f65a5e780c8dff9cdc3a056f3",
"type": "md5"
},
{
"hash": "f49125dac3:352bb35ffrca2:a123dc4599245",
"type": "superhash" # A "custom" hash type.
},
{
"hash": "12343773a88f65a5e780c8dff9cdc3a0"
# Default is "md5", if it's not specified.
}
]
}
}
Whadayathink? JSA From: cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Kirillov, Ivan A. <ikirillov@mitre.org>
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2015 10:07 AM To: cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [cti-cybox] CybOX 3.0: HashType Refactoring All,
As I mentioned on last week’s call, we’ve got another proposal related to CybOX 3.0 to get your feedback on: https://github.com/CybOXProject/schemas/wiki/CybOX-3.0:-HashType-Refactoring
This one is around refactoring the way hashes (especially common ones like MD5 and SHA1) are currently captured. Accordingly, we’d love to get your general thoughts on the proposal as well as on the related questions:
Regards,
Ivan and Trey
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]