Re: [cti-cybox] CybOX 3.0: File Object Refactoring

["Kirillov, Ivan A." <ikirillov@mitre.org>]

That’s a fair point, Jason – my only counter-argument is that most queries such as these can easily be expressed with a regular _expression_. 

E.g., for "find all observables that <match other params> and are explorer.exe” you’d have:

     file_name.regex = "explorer\.exe$”

As far as John’s point about file extensions, I’d completely agree that they’re largely superfluous today. It’s also worth noting that our concept of “extensions” has to do with extending the File Object with context/domain-specific data and NOT with regards to “.dll”, “.exe” and so forth. Perhaps we need another name for it :)

Regards,

Ivan

From: Jason Keirstead
Date: Thursday, November 19, 2015 at 2:37 PM
To: Ivan Kirillov
Cc: "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org"
Subject: Re: [cti-cybox] CybOX 3.0: File Object Refactoring

My only comment - and I have not decided where I sit on the fence - is that if you remove "file extension" and "file name" properties, and consolidate them all into one value called "path", this will make filtering and QUERY more difficult against your data.

IE

"find all observables that <match other params> and are DLL" or
"find all observables that <match other params> and are explorer.exe"




-
Jason Keirstead
Product Architect, Security Intelligence, IBM Security Systems
www.ibm.com/security | www.securityintelligence.com

Without data, all you are is just another person with an opinion - Unknown


"Kirillov, Ivan A." ---11/19/2015 01:20:31 PM---All, As Trey mentioned in his previous email, we’ve been thinking about how to refactor and fix the

From: "Kirillov, Ivan A." <ikirillov@mitre.org>
To: "cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: 11/19/2015 01:20 PM
Subject: [cti-cybox] CybOX 3.0: File Object Refactoring
Sent by: <cti-cybox@lists.oasis-open.org>

---

All,

As Trey mentioned in his previous email, we’ve been thinking about how to refactor and fix the issues associated with the File Object (and its subclasses). Accordingly, we’ve put together a page that outlines the existing issues and our ideas on addressing them: https://github.com/CybOXProject/schemas/wiki/CybOX-3.0:-File-Object-Refactoring

We’ll be discussing this during today’s call, but we’d love to get your input here (and/or on Slack) as well – generally on your feelings with regards to these changes, but also on:

• Are there any other issues with the File Object and its subclasses that we’re missing?
• Does the concept of domain-specific/context-specific extension points make sense?
  • Are there any other default extensions that we should be adding?
  • Are there any other properties for the default extensions that we should be adding?

Also, we’d like to highlight that we’re still thinking through some of the implications of this approach (how to manage/version/update extensions, etc.), so consider this a living document.

Regards,
Ivan and Trey