[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-interoperability] Interop sub-committee meeting agenda topics for 22nd March
Thanks Pat. Jason said he would be able to run the meetings but if for some reason he’s not then your offer is much appreciated and we’ll take you up on it. Regards allan From:
Patrick Maroney <pmaroney@wapacklabs.com> Allan, I can host the call if you want. Just say the word and I'll coordinate.
I’ll review it before then and provide feedback either directly in the doc or over email. Next week I have an all day meeting to attend and therefore Jason K will have to run the meeting instead of me. We’ll have to figure out conference facility for that meeting as Jason will
not be able to start the audio without me. allan From:
"Taylor, Marlon" <Marlon.Taylor@hq.dhs.gov> Thanks. I added my text. Do you want to go over it on our subcommittee meeting next week? -Marlon From: Allan Thomson [mailto:athomson@lookingglasscyber.com]
Hi Marlon – I just granted you comment/suggest access. Let me know if you cant suggest the new text. I also responded to your questions directly. allan From:
"Taylor, Marlon" <Marlon.Taylor@hq.dhs.gov> Hi All, I drafted my COA section but I only have view access to the document. I asked Allan to grant access but I have not received access yet. Here are some of my document comments so far. I can’t put them inline due to access restrictions: -
Should we show examples for
relationship and malware without including them as separate sections? -
Formatting difference (indentions) -
Different document flows (Indicator Sharing is different from Versioning) After I get access I’ll add the COA section. -Marlon From:
cti-interoperability@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:cti-interoperability@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Taylor, Marlon Hi All, From:
cti-interoperability@lists.oasis-open.org on behalf of Allan Thomson Interop Sub-committee –
I haven’t seen any new changes or comments to the specification since I sent this email on Friday. I have not made any other changes since then. Are there any meeting agenda items for tomorrow? I’m not aware of any and therefore I would suggest that we cancel tomorrow’s meeting. We have work to do on the spec: a)
Add additional test cases for optional areas (Volunteers needed) b)
Course of Action (marlon -> ready for review?) c)
Add comments/feedback on existing text (all) If I don’t hear any meeting topics by 6pm PST Tuesday 21st then I will cancel Weds 22nd working meeting. Allan From:
"cti@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Allan Thomson <athomson@lookingglasscyber.com> All –
If your organization has
a data feed, a TIP or a SIEM and the organization intends to be STIX 2.0 compliant then please provide input and feedback. Your feedback is requested on the STIX 2.0 Interoperability Use Case and Test Specification document.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1l54RhjxwuXrZUQ19zIHUiZ7_c6otbLbVVfluKJogU7s/edit# Also attached is a PDF version of the document. The Interop sub-committee goal is to have a 2nd Draft of the document by 15th April that incorporates any feedback received between now and then. Regards Allan Thomson Interop Co-Chair |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]