[cti-stix] [cti-users] MTI Binding

[Terry MacDonald <terry.macdonald@threatloop.com>]

+1. Is a nice idea as we can see a size and complexity comparison. Is there any chance each person can document the process that the generation took? I'm thinking it could be useful to see how complicated the toolchain for developing each type of output is.

Cheers
Terry MacDonald

> On 3 Oct 2015 6:33 am, "Jordan, Bret" <bret.jordan@bluecoat.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think this is a great idea..  
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Bret
>>
>>
>>
>> Bret Jordan CISSP
>> Director of Security Architecture and Standards | Office of the CTO
>> Blue Coat Systems
>> PGP Fingerprint: 63B4 FC53 680A 6B7D 1447  F2C0 74F8 ACAE 7415 0050
>> "Without cryptography vihv vivc ce xhrnrw, however, the only thing that can not be unscrambled is an egg." 
>>
>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 14:08, Wunder, John A. <jwunder@mitre.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> How about we take two of the idioms on the stixproject.github.io site?
>>>
>>> - http://stixproject.github.io/documentation/idioms/c2-indicator/
>>> - http://stixproject.github.io/documentation/idioms/simple-incident/
>>>
>>> Thanks for helping out. I think it would be nice to see these as:
>>>
>>> - Current STIX XML (Done already)
>>> - Simplified XML (TBD, maybe if the JSON one is quick I’ll do this too)
>>> - JSON/JSON-Schema (Wunder)
>>> - JSON-LD (Casanave)
>>> - Any others people are interest (PMML, Thrift, ProtoBuf, etc)
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>> On Oct 2, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Cory Casanave <cory-c@modeldriven.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Re: Examples.
>>>> Pick your examples, I can help out. Would prefer to baseline off of the same schema subset & example data, current STIX is fine to define the examples. I suggest at least one that is very simple “pure hierarchical data” and at least one with some related entities.
>>>> -Cory
>>
>>