Re: [cti-stix] Proposal to establish Sightings (#306) and Relationships (#291) as our official issue topics under active consideration for STIX v2.0

[Trey Darley <trey@soltra.com>]

On 28.10.2015 18:12:32, Barnum, Sean D. wrote:
> 
> So, we would like to propose officially establishing that the
> following two issues are the active issues currently under
> consideration for STIX v2.0:
> 
> * Abstract Sightings into an independent construct rather than
>   embedded within Indicator
>   <https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/306>
>   (<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/306>#306)<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/306> 
>
> * Abstract relationships as top-level constructs rather than
>   embedded within other constructs
>   <https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/291>
>   (<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/291>#291)<https://github.com/STIXProject/schemas/issues/291>
> 

Hey, Sean -

I like this approach. Those two constructs are interrelated, have long
been hot topics, and seem like a very sensible place to focus our
discussion. +1

-- 
Cheers,
Trey
--
Trey Darley
Senior Security Engineer
4DAA 0A88 34BC 27C9 FD2B  A97E D3C6 5C74 0FB7 E430
Soltra | An FS-ISAC & DTCC Company
www.soltra.com
--
"Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three)." --RFC 1925

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature