[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cti-stix] Some thoughts on Sightings and conversations to date (Part #4): should sightings have IDs?
[+1] On the consistent use of IDs across CTI, including Sightings
[+1] On Alternative_ID (unless the TL Relationship Object could be used?).
Patrick Maroney
President
Integrated Networking Technologies, Inc.
Office: (856)983-0001
Cell: (609)841-5104
From: <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Sean Barnum <sbarnum@mitre.org>
Date: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 at 1:54 PM To: "cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org" <cti-stix@lists.oasis-open.org> Subject: [cti-stix] Some thoughts on Sightings and conversations to date (Part #4): should sightings have IDs? The fourth sightings sub-topic I wanted to comment on is around the question of
whether sightings should have IDs or not.
I think there have been some clear assertions (along with their rationale) from Jason and Bret that it does not make sense for sightings to have IDs but also some good clear arguments from John, Terry and others for
why unique and persistent IDs are relevant for consumers to be able to reference, correlate and analyze diverse sightings from diverse sighters.
Again, putting on my expert hat rather than my co-chair hat, I wanted to offer some thoughts on this which are primarily just stating agreement with the arguments made by John, Terry and others.
sean
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]